collapse Photo

User Picture

Enough about the Microwavers already!

With the new age of DJ software and digital vinyl systems (DVS) out there, I'm finding it ridiculous how much lately I keep hearing DJs complain to no end about the so-called "microwave DJs" out there.

They're referring to the new generation of DJs who took a big shortcut in the craft.  These guys either purchased or illegally downloaded software like Traktor or Ableton Live, and then spent even more time downloading loads of MP3s off P2P programs, torrents, and blog sites.  Within months, these rookies somehow manage to slither their way into DJ guest spots and even club residencies, the kinds that took seasoned veterans years to attain.  The main complaint isn't just on all the music they pirate from the internet, but their lack of experience, experimentation, and even how many of them let the software do most of the work, like beatmatching.

I've heard all the complaints lately about how these rookies lack the experience to really read a crowd, how they totally rely on the software to match beats (even though the blends sound terrible), how much music they steal as opposed to buying legally, how many of them are very cocky and disrespectful, and how they play for way less money than a seasoned veteran would charge.

Should we come down on these DJs?  Are they the problem?  I've seen bad DJs since way before anyone came up with DJ software, and I've seen some of these inexperienced cocky rookies manage to slither their way into the booth.  I never blamed the DJ though, because even when I was a year or so into DJing I was trying to get gigs.  I blame the promoters and those who book these DJs.

When I hear DJs bash on other DJs because they're not using actual vinyl on turntables, it astounds me.  It's the same when I see CD DJs bashed.  Who is more "keepin' it real"?  The guy using antiquated gear to its limits?  Or the guy who takes things to new levels and innovates?  I remember when Pioneer came out with a nice effects unit on its mixers, it meant DJs didn't have to echo or flange with two records anymore.  Was that cheating?  How about when the CDJs came out and you could spin CDs the way you do wax?  How many of you know that even the pioneers of house music used not only turntables, but tape players and drum machines in the booth?  Were they cheating?

Let's come down to reality.  When I got into Final Scratch years ago, and then later Deckadance and now Torq, none of those pieces of software would make things easier on me in the technique of mixing.  I still had to match my beats and blend well.  Yes some of them can do some beatmatching, but it only works well on tunes that have a simple beat structure.  Imagine trying to auto-beatmatch with jungle, or breaks, or tribal house.  Won't work as well.

The software basically makes it way easier for DJs to do their thing without having to haul around loads of equipment.  They make it so I can carry way more music on a laptop than 80-100 records in a box.  It makes it easier for me to find a tune I want to play, rather than dig through the crates.  It allows me to only bring that remix or version I want of a tune, not the rest of what came on the record or CD.

Whether you're using Torq, Serato, Traktor, Virtual DJ, PC DJ, Deckadance, or even Ableton, it won't make anyone instantly into a DJ.  It won't tell you what track to play next.  It won't automatically tweak your EQs, tell you where to toss in the next track, or even do tricks that wow the crowd.  It is simply a tool, and it only works as well as the person is skilled in using it.

I know this doesn't come as a comfort when you're a 10-15 year veteran of the decks, and some cocky arrogant kid now is getting the spots you used to get.  Just bear in mind, would you really want that spot?  Walk into the event and really see what's going on.  If that kid is basically a human iPod playing the same music you hear on the radio, then is that really a good gig?  If he's having horrible mixes, but the crowd doesn't care, is that a crowd you really want to play for?

In the game of love and dating, the phrase "don't hate the player, hate the game" has come out many times.  It's the same deal here.  Don't hate the rookie for how he plays.  Hate the guy who decided a $50 a night amateur was more worthwhile than an experienced professional who costs more.  Worse is if you can't bring anyone out to a club, but the rookie has 30 friends who will come out, then you're SOL.  Sucks, but that's the way of the world.

The answer isn't to hate on the rookies, but first to find out if they are playing gigs you really want.  If the answer is no, then you need to stop #%%*@@## and find a scene where you can play the way you want.  I know I don't want to play Top 40 music at some cookie-cutter glam bottle service club...so why would I complain about a rookie who wants to play that scene?

This is why I never made DJing a career, so I never had to be forced to do things I didn't feel like doing.  If the scene isn't the way you want it, then make your own scene, rather than complain.  Start a night up. Throw raves.  Do internet or college radio.  Make mixes and post them online.  Find the people who want to hear what you like and play to them...or find a way to please the masses and market yourself to better compete.

If a promoter is going to still pass you up for an inexpensive amateur, then it only speaks loudly on how bad the event is and how long this guy will last.  Eventually things change and crowds see how bad these DJs are...and thus move on.  Empty rooms means that kid isn't going to get hired again.

So enough about the Microwave DJs.  It's not their fault someone decided to book them over you.  You can complain to death, but until you yourself work to make change, then your complaints are worthless.

 
Overall Rating: starstarstarstarstar
Please log in to rate this post and comment.

 
Comments

livo
I agree with you 150%!
I am so sick of promoters packing 4 bad DJ's at a bar just because they will take $100 each. It totally whores the industry and at the end of the night, nobody really cared for the music except the promoter who made his pockets fat.

We need to support our talented DJs because they are the ones who can create a vibe @ an event and understand how a crowd reacts to the music and be able to make quick adjustments to make the masses happy.

Ever been to a great wedding that just lost its Kefi cause the music was bad. Ever been to a cheezy wedding that ended up being great cause the music rocked?

D_Jam
I agree with you on supporting talented DJs...be it popular ones or unknowns who need the exposure. In the end, the scene needs to more or less know what makes a good DJ.

Let's face it, if a shadey promoter hires four inexperienced (and untalented) rookies for his night at $50 each, and then has to pack his room with underage girls and club douches...then it speaks loudly on the promoter and how bad his event is.

The experienced DJs shouldn't complain about the quality of the DJs in that event but more realize that promoter isn't someone they should ever work with, and the event isn't something they should ever get involved with.

The complainers should just realize if they don't like the scene, then don't support it...or make their own scene.

livo
I just wish I had the talent to DJ period! Cause I would rock! lol